Springsteen Cover Band Pays for Boss’s Anti-Trump Comments

New Jersey bar cancels Springsteen tribute band after Boss’s anti-Trump comments, leaving working musicians caught in political crossfire they never joined.

Al Landes Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. We provide honest, unbiased insights to help our readers make informed decisions.

Image credit: Bruce Springsteen

Key Takeaways

    • New Jersey bar canceled Springsteen tribute band after Boss criticized Trump administration

    • Cover band lost $2,500 gig despite offering non-political classic rock setlist

    • Incident highlights growing collision between artist politics and tribute performer livelihoods

Your favorite cover band lost their biggest gig because of something they never said. No Surrender tribute band, a nine-piece Springsteen tribute act with two decades of experience, was caught in political crossfire when Riv’s Toms River Hub canceled their May 30th show. The reason? Bruce Springsteen called Trump’s administration “corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous” during a Manchester concert.

Venue Owner Reacts to Springsteen’s Comments

Bar owner Tony Rivoli pulled the plug faster than a soundcheck gone wrong. “now because Bruce can’t keep his mouth shut we’re screwed,” Rivoli texted bandleader Brad Hobicorn, citing his conservative clientele’s potential backlash. When your tribute band becomes collateral damage in America’s political divide, something’s fundamentally broken in live music culture.

The Financial Reality for Tribute Bands

The financial reality hits hardest for working musicians across an industry where over 10,000 tribute acts operate nationwide. Hobicorn offered to perform non-Springsteen classics instead—Tom Petty, Billy Joel, standard rock crowd-pleasers. But Rivoli refused to pay the agreed $2,500 fee for anything other than Boss covers—mirroring how Springsteen’s rediscovered Nashville sessions now shine as a hidden country milestone in his expansive musical legacy.

Free Speech, Livelihoods, and Musical Interpretation

This isn’t about free speech and live music; it’s about how an artist’s opinions now threaten the livelihoods of musicians who simply play their songs. No Surrender eventually booked the Headliner Oasis in Neptune City, but the precedent feels ominous for thousands of tribute band business challenges nationwide who depend on venue bookings.

“This is not political for us at all. We’re just a cover band that’s trying to make some money, and people rely on it financially. We’re the ones really getting hurt,” Hobicorn explained, capturing the disconnect between artistic interpretation and political liability. When covering someone’s music becomes an endorsement of their worldview, we’ve entered dangerous territory where musical tribute transforms into ideological association.

The Growing Culture War in Live Music

The irony cuts deep—Springsteen built his career celebrating working-class struggles, yet his political stance now threatens working musicians’ paychecks. Your local tribute band shouldn’t need a disclaimer that they don’t share the original artist’s political views, but, in music industry trends 2025, musical interpretation requires political vetting—a sobering reminder of how music industry scandals can ripple far beyond the headlines.

Until venues develop clearer policies separating tribute acts from original artists’ politics, working musicians remain vulnerable to culture wars in music they never enlisted in.

OUR Editorial Process

Our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human research. We provide honest, unbiased insights to help our readers make informed decisions. See how we write our content here →