Sharon Osbourne Blocks Black Sabbath’s Lost ‘Earth’ Recordings

Sharon Osbourne threatens legal action against former manager Jim Simpson over 1969 Birmingham studio demos

Al Landes Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. We provide honest, unbiased insights to help our readers make informed decisions.

Image credit: Wikimedia

Key Takeaways

  • Sharon Osbourne blocks former manager’s planned July 2025 release of 1969 Earth recordings
  • Jim Simpson claims ownership rights based on paying original £500 Zella Studios bill
  • Legal dispute mirrors broader tensions over streaming-era catalog control and vintage recordings

Catalog ownership battles shouldn’t overshadow artistic legacy, yet Sharon Osbourne‘s public clash with former Black Sabbath manager Jim Simpson over unreleased 1969 recordings exposes exactly that tension. The dispute centers on “Earth: The Legendary Lost Tapes”—demos recorded when the future metal pioneers still performed under their original name—and highlights how vintage recordings become battlegrounds between artist estates and former business partners.

The Tapes That Time Forgot

These contested recordings, captured at Birmingham’s Zella Studios in 1969, document Ozzy Osbourne, Tony Iommi, Geezer Butler, and Bill Ward during their Earth phase—before they’d invent heavy metal as we know it. Simpson, who managed the band during this formative period, claims ownership rights based on paying the original £500 studio bill.

He planned to release the compilation in July 2025 until Sharon Osbourne intervened with threats of litigation. According to Sharon’s November statements on The Osbournes podcast, the band hasn’t even heard these tapes, despite Simpson’s claims of exclusive ownership.

Manager vs. Estate Guardian

Simpson counters that he’s offered royalty splits to band members and would donate proceeds to charity if they refuse payment. He maintains that Sharon rebuffed his attempts at reaching a royalty agreement through what he describes as threatening emails.

Sharon disputes Simpson’s narrative entirely, suggesting he’s timing the release to exploit expiring copyrights while keeping all profits. The public back-and-forth resembles a less glamorous version of the Taylor Swift masters controversy—except here, the artists never consented to the original deal being made public decades later.

Precedent for Catalog Conflicts

This standoff reflects broader tensions as streaming platforms make historical recordings more valuable than ever. The dispute mirrors recent battles over Beatles outtakes, Prince vault material, and countless bootleg releases that surface without artist approval.

For Black Sabbath fans, the tantalizing prospect of hearing the band’s earliest creative stirrings remains frozen in legal limbo. Whether Simpson’s managerial role from 55 years ago grants him publication rights may determine how other vintage recordings reach audiences—or remain locked away while estates and former business partners argue over who controls musical history.

OUR Editorial Process

Our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human research. We provide honest, unbiased insights to help our readers make informed decisions. See how we write our content here →